logo

 

The chromatographic profile of the sample was simple, showing good separation of cane sugar and lactose. Peak of cane sugar and lactose were identified using the solvent system [n-Butanol: Acetic acid: Water:: 2:1:1 (v/v)]. Cane sugar and lactose are not UV active, so the plates were derivatized using aniline diphenylamine phosphoric acid (Fig. 1). The Rf value of cane sugar and lactose was found to be 0.52 and 0.43 ± 0.03 respectively and there was no overlap with any other analyses of the sample at 520 nm (Fig.2).


obs_exp4_1
Fig. 1: Derivatized image of HPTLC plate


obs_exp4_2
Fig. 2: 3D-display of cane sugars and lactose

The linearity of the proposed method was confirmed in the range of 200-1000 ng of standard cane sugar and lactose. A linear regression of the data points for standard cane sugars is resulted in a calibration curve with the equation Y = 2721.717 + 2.317 X [regression coefficient (r2) = 0.98841, standard deviation (S.D.) = 2.65%] (Fig. 3). Similarly the linear regression of the data points for standard lactose is resulted in a calibration curve with the equation Y = 4462.410 + 7.472 X [regression coefficient (r2) = 0.99624, standard deviation (S.D.) = 2.52%] (Fig. 4). Cane sugar and lactose contents in market purchased milk samples were calculated and depicted in Table 1.

obs_exp4_3
Fig. 3: Calibration curve of cane sugar


obs_exp4_4
Fig. 4: Calibration curve of lactose


Table 1: Cane sugars and lactose content in milk

Milk Samples (%) Cane sugar (%) Lactose (%)
Pure Milk 0 (naturally occurring) 5.0 (naturally occurring)
Milk sample 1 30.56 ± 0.60 17.38 ± 0.72
Milk sample 2 27.11 ± 0.54 14.44 ± 0.44
Milk sample 3 19.98 ± 0.67 11.21 ± 0.39


The linearity, accuracy in terms of recovery % and precision was considered for the method. Validation of the method at three concentration levels was carried out by the standard recovery formula returned a mean of 91.76%. Precision (repeatability) was determined by running a minimum of four analyses and the coefficient of variability was found to be 3.114 and 2.156 % for cane sugars and lactose respectively. The limit of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) for cane sugar was found to be 3.58 and 10.87 and for lactose it is 1.17 and 3.546 ng respectively.